COUNTED, NOT PREDICTED

Master 1 decks that win more than they get played

Each deck below clears the Master 1 field's own average win rate of 47.0%, and is queued less often than an even slice of that field's games. Both halves are measured from real battles in the Master 1 (leagues 1-2) bracket.

"Under-played" is measured against this bracket and no other: a share that is rare where four hundred decks are tracked is ordinary where forty are. The line is this bracket's own even slice — its total play divided by the decks measured in it, 0.80% each — so a deck qualifies by being rarer than it would be if the field spread its games evenly.

5 decks in this bracket carry enough comparable battles to be measured this way. Measured Aug 16, 2026

A deck the bracket board did not rank carries no model number. Ask for one and it is computed once, then cached — the next reader who opens this page gets it without waiting and without spending their allowance.

SORT BY

01
Mortar Skeleton Barrel Fireball57/100Offbeat
Avg elixir 3.5 · 303 battles
Win rate
58.4%
Above field average
+11.4 pts
Share of play
0.41% of play
Observed WR
58.4%
303 battles, this bracket
Model WR
—
Originality
57
Offbeat
02
Royal Hogs Archer Queen Earthquake29/100Familiar
Avg elixir 2.9 · 278 battles
Win rate
53.4%
Above field average
+6.4 pts
Share of play
0.42% of play
Observed WR
53.4%
278 battles, this bracket
Model WR
—
Originality
29
Familiar
03
X-Bow Archers Fireball11/100Familiar
Avg elixir 3 · 396 battles
Win rate
50.9%
Above field average
+3.9 pts
Share of play
0.56% of play
Observed WR
50.9%
396 battles, this bracket
Model WR
—
Originality
11
Familiar

CLASSEMENT DU MODÈLE

Meilleurs decks Master 1

Autres ligues classées

Toutes les ligues et arènes

Questions sur ce classement

What makes a Master 1 deck underrated?: On this page, two measured facts at once: the deck beats the Master 1 field's own average win rate of 47.0%, and it is queued less often than an even slice of that field's games — the share every deck would hold if play were spread evenly. Both come from counted battles rather than from a model prediction.
Are these win rates reliable?: Each deck's rate is computed only from battles where both sides played a deck the bracket genuinely plays, and the two crawl orientations are averaged 50/50 rather than pooled. Every deck also carries the number of battles behind its rate, printed next to it, so a thin sample is visible rather than hidden.
Should I switch to one of these decks?: They win more than the field average in this bracket, so they are worth trying — but a rarely played deck is also a deck your opponents have less practice against, and part of the edge is that unfamiliarity. Score your own list against the same bracket in the Deck Lab before committing to it.

Master 1 decks that win more than they get played

5 decks in this bracket carry enough comparable battles to be measured this way. Measured Aug 16, 2026

Questions sur ce classement

What makes a Master 1 deck underrated?

On this page, two measured facts at once: the deck beats the Master 1 field's own average win rate of 47.0%, and it is queued less often than an even slice of that field's games — the share every deck would hold if play were spread evenly. Both come from counted battles rather than from a model prediction.

Are these win rates reliable?

Each deck's rate is computed only from battles where both sides played a deck the bracket genuinely plays, and the two crawl orientations are averaged 50/50 rather than pooled. Every deck also carries the number of battles behind its rate, printed next to it, so a thin sample is visible rather than hidden.

Should I switch to one of these decks?

They win more than the field average in this bracket, so they are worth trying — but a rarely played deck is also a deck your opponents have less practice against, and part of the edge is that unfamiliarity. Score your own list against the same bracket in the Deck Lab before committing to it.